Obama’s assault on Jerusalem’s Western Wall: –“Bill Clinton’s Parameters (2000): The Temple Mount in Palestine, the Western Wall in Israel.” –“Obama’s UNSC 2334 : both are in Palestine”

This book reveals Obama’s role in the plot to take the Western Wall from Israel -The settlements occupy only 1.7% of the West Bank. The Obama administration lied about “massive settlement construction”. By inventing the fake news of “massive settlement construction”, they created a false sense of urgency to justify the anti-Israel UNSC 2334 resolution. -Obama’s UNSC 2334 rules that “the establishment by Israel of settlements in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, has no legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law” it rules that both the Temple Mount and the Western Wall are in “occupied Palestinian territory” -In his autobiography Bill Clinton describes his parameters for a final status agreement (2000): “On territory, I recommended 94 to 96 percent of the West Bank for the Palestinians with a land swap from Israel of 1 to 3 percent, and an understanding that the land kept by Israel would include 80 percent of the settlers in blocs…On Jerusalem, I recommended that the Arab neighborhoods be in Palestine and the Jewish neighborhoods in Israel, and that the Palestinians should have sovereignty over the Temple Mount/Haram and the Israelis sovereignty over the Western Wall…When Arafat came to see me…he wanted Israel to have the Wailing Wall, because of its religious significance, but asserted that the remaining fifty feet of the Western Wall should go to the Palestinians. I told him he was wrong, that Israel should have the entire wall to protect itself from someone using one entrance of the tunnel that ran beneath the wall from damaging the remains of the temples beneath the Haram. The Old City has four quarters: Jewish, Muslim Christian, and Armenian. It was assumed that Palestine would get the Muslim and Christian quarters, with Israel getting the other two. Arafat argued that he should have a few blocks of the Armenian quarter because of the Christian churches there. I couldn’t believe he was talking to me about this….I said these parameters were nonnegotiable and were the best I could do…Arafat’s rejection of my proposal after Barak accepted it was an error of historic proportions…” -Source: Clinton,    Bill. “My Life.” Vintage (2005). pp. 936-946. https://www.amazon.com/My-Life-Bill-Clinton/dp/140003003X/ref=pd_sim_b_1 http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/president-clinton-reflects-on-2000-camp-david-summit -Obama tried to portrait UNSC 2334 as being about settlements but it is actually much more than that. If Obama just wanted to stop settlement growth,as he claims, why did he authorize a resolution that rules that both Jerusalem’s Temple Mount and the Western Wall are “occupied Palestinian territory”? (While Clinton’s parameters were that it is nonnegotiable that the Temple Mount would be in Palestine while the Western Wall would remain in Israel) -A point by point comparison shows that there are major differences between Ytzhak Rabin’s view on the Oslo Accords (1993, 1995), Bill Clinton’s parameters for peace (2000) and Obama’s UNSC 2334 (2016). This book presents a point by point comparison on Territory, Securiy, Jerusalem, Holy Sites, Refugees. -Before UNSC 2334 the territories were “disputed”, now they are “illegally occupied”. Obama’s UNSC 2334 turned Israel into a criminal State. Obama’s UNSC 2334 has killed the Peace Process, there is nothing left to negotiate. The ICC will now impose a timeline for an Israeli withdrawal. The ICC will give Israel a choice: stay in the territories and be marginalized as a criminal State or withdraw from the territories and commit suicide. Obama’s UNSC 2334 is a formula for Israel’s destruction: If Israel withdraws from all the West Bank’s land, Hamas will take over and attack Israel from the West Bank from as it does from Gaza.