New Article by William Hanna about Charlie Hebdo Attack

Who Benefits the Most From The Charlie Hebdo Attack? 

At the time when much was being written about the John F. Kennedy assassination and false flag conspiracy theories were abounding, one writer suggested that the best approach to finding an answer to the question of “who killed Kennedy,” was simply to ask “who benefited most from his death.” In his book Final Judgment: The Missing link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy, historian and author Michael Collins Piper asserted that Israel’s motive for the assassination was Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion’s outrage at JFK’s opposition to Israel becoming a nuclear power, and that in his final days as Prime Minister, Ben-Gurion commanded the Mossad to become involved in a plot to kill America’s president. JFK’s assassination served the dual purpose of eliminating not only the threat to Israel’s nuclear ambitions, but also the need for the tax-exempt American Zionist Council (AZC ) to register as a foreign agent. In order to disguise its Zionist credentials and avoid legal action, the AZC then relinquished its tax-exempt status and morphed into the American Zionist Committee for Public Affairs (AZCPA) before finally becoming the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) which achieved and still retains total control over those corrupt bribe-taking occupiers of the U.S. Senate and Congress.
“Israel’s Mossad was a primary (and critical) behind the scenes player in the conspiracy that ended the life of JFK. Through its own vast resources and through its international contacts in the intelligence community and in organised crime, Israel had the means, it had the opportunity, and it had the motive to play a major frontline role in the crime of the century – and it did.”
It is interesting — but not surprising — to note that in all the words written and uttered about the Kennedy assassination, Israel’s intelligence agency, the Mossad, has never been mentioned. And yet a Mossad motive is obvious. On this question, as on almost all others, American reporters and commentators cannot bring themselves cast Israel in an unfavourable light — despite the obvious fact that Mossad complicity is as plausible as any of the other theories.”
Former Rep. Paul Findley (R-I11.), in the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.


So to continue with the theme of false flag operations, could the attack in Paris on the editorial offices of the so-called satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo — for whom stoking Islamophobia has proven to be a financially viable business proposition — have been a Mossad operation designed to stem the growing tide of support and sympathy among people in France and other European countries for the Palestinian aspiration of achieving independence and statehood? Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had after all previously warned that “recognition of a Palestinian state by France would be a grave mistake.” Such a hypothesis is by no means far fetched when carefully considering the events as reported by the Jewish-controlled mainstream media.
In his book 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA, Webster Griffin Tarpley asserts that there were  four key factors required for the successful execution of false flag terror operations: low IQ patsies, dupes and useful idiots who will take centre stage in the mainstream media as the alleged attackers as was the case with with Lee Harvey Oswald in the JFK assassination; professional executioners with the means and technical capability to carry out the attack while personally remaining unseen and shifting the blame onto the patsies; the privatised command structure of the shadowy bankrolling instigators who cannot be specifically identified; and the all-important ownership of the corporate media that promotes the narrative of the useful idiots being responsible rather than the elusive professionals.
Mossad false flag operations are not a new phenomenon and have even included attacks against Jews and Israeli allies who offer more than generous support including economic and military aid. In the summer of 1954 in what came to be known as the Lavon Affair, Israel used a group of Egyptian Jews for its Operation Susannah with a view to planting bombs in U.S. and British-owned civilian targets, cinemas, libraries and American educational centres. The attacks were intended to direct blame on the Muslim Brotherhood, Egyptian Communists, “unspecified malcontents,” or “local nationalists” so as to create sufficient violence and instability that would induce Britain to retain its occupying forces in Egypt’s Suez Canal zone. The plot, however, failed when the Egyptian Intelligence Service followed and arrested a suspect whose bomb had accidentally ignited prematurely in his pocket and a subsequent search of his apartment revealed  incriminating evidence including the names of his accomplices.
In the summer of 1967 during the Six Day War, deliberately unmarked Israeli Air Force jet fighter aircraft and Navy torpedo boats in a combined air and sea assault on the USS Liberty killed 34 and wounded 170 crew members while severely damaging the ship. Israel’s intention was to sink the ship and blame the Egyptians so as to drag the U.S. into a war against Egypt on Israel’s behalf. Since then a former Navy attorney who helped lead the military investigation of the attack has categorically stated that President Johnson (LBJ) and his defence secretary, Robert McNamara, ordered that the inquiry conclude the incident was an accident. Retired Capt. Ward Boston in a signed affidavit released at a Capitol Hill news conference, said LBJ and McNamara told those heading the Navy’s inquiry to “conclude that the attack was a case of ‘mistaken identity’ despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.” Retired Admiral Thomas Moorer, a former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman who spent a year investigating the attack as part of an independent panel established with other former military officials, stated that it was “one of the classic all-American cover-ups.” Moorer, who was chief of naval operations at the time of the attack, asked from his wheelchair at the news conference “Why would our government put Israel’s interests ahead of our own”? He had always believed the attack was a deliberate act and wanted Congress to carry out an investigation.
By staging the Paris attacks, Israel’s Mossad’s would have helped to further reinforce not only the image of the Muslims as a terrorists who are opposed to civilised Western values such as freedom of expression, but also the perception of their being incapable of coexisting harmoniously within Western societies. Such reenforcement by Israel would drive a wedge between the the Western citizen majorities and the Muslim minorities by dissuading Western governments and citizens from adhering to their newly discovered humanity of regarding Palestinians as the victims rather than the aggressors as had been portrayed for decades by the Israeli elite and the Zionist controlled mainstream media. Despite the inducement by Zionism of rampant Islamophobia in the United States, most American citizens are actually in far more danger of being shot and killed by their own “to protect and to serve” racist police forces than they are by militant Islamic terrorists. In the past racist American used to put on Ku Klux Klan white robes and pointed hats complete with full-faced cloth masks and eyeholes before clandestinely hanging African Americans. Nowadays they dispense with formality by just wearing police uniforms and quite openly shooting their usually innocent victims.
So what would Israel have gained by masterminding the Paris attacks? To start with, in the immediate aftermath of the shootings, the state and Zionist-controlled media sought to exploit the fear and the confusion of the general public; it enabled claims throughout Europe and the U.S. that the attack on the Charlie Hebdo magazine was an assault on the freedom of the press while omitting to mention that US-NATO State-Sponsored Terrorism is the “Number One Killer” of Journalists and that during the latest assault on Gaza, 17 Palestinian journalists were killed by the Israeli army so as suppress the truth pertaining to Israeli atrocities; it enabled Netanyahu to gatecrash the Paris march while grandstanding not just as an Israeli leader, but as the concerned leader of all Jews who would be welcomed in Israel with “open arms.”; it provided Israel with the excuse to announce the expansion of more illegal settlements to house the influx of more Jews from France; it enabled European powers to announce the implementation of police state measures with France seeking greater authority to monitor the Internet so as to counter support for terrorist or subversive activities, and Britain’s GCHQ being granted greater surveillance powers that would create a “Big Brother” environment wherein criticism of Israel would be discouraged; and it enabled the deployment of extra police and armed forces to defend Jews against anti-Semitic attacks.
The Jewish perception that there is widespread anti-Semitism suggests an egocentric presumption on the part of Jews that the majority of goyim (non-Jewish people) have nothing better to do than to preoccupy themselves with being actively anti-Semitic. By having such a perception, Jews continue to overlook the possibility that most people do not actually hate “Jews,” but resent the overbearing arrogance and barbaric inhumanity of a state whose supremacist contempt for international law and human rights is wilfully exercised in the name, and on behalf of the Jewish people. It has to be recognised that the average person’s innate desire for justice and human rights does not include special dispensation for Jews even if they do like to delude themselves with the belief that they above all other human beings were chosen by God Himself. The mainstream media-propagated view that to demand an Israeli respect for international law and human rights constitutes anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial is an arrogant and outrageous double standard and an aberration to be challenged and fiercely resisted. It follows that the inherent arrogance of Jewish exceptionalism will invite resentment, ridicule, and resistance.
Jewish exceptionalism decrees that Israel has the right (granted by the Holocaust) to disregard accountability for its own actions while vociferously demanding that others accede to its commands and wishes; a right to continue seeking Holocaust restitution and retribution while overlooking its own responsibilities with regard to its war crimes against the Palestinian people; a right to blackmail, to bribe, to bully, to harangue, and to threaten as did Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman — Israel “would act on dissolving the ICC” — following the International Criminal Court’s decision to launch a preliminary investigation to determine “whether war crimes have been committed” during Israel’s 2014 assault on Gaza; a right to misuse state and federal law to pressure universities to restrict criticism of Israel on campus; and a right to insist on the enactment in all countries of special legislation specifically to cover “anti-Semitism” despite existing laws on discrimination. The following is a “must watch” short video of Israeli facts:
Any clear-thinking and fair-minded person would have to correctly conclude that Israel is a sick society as was recently admitted by Israeli President Reuven Rivlin who while referring to acts of violence perpetrated by Jews, said it was “time to honestly admit that Israeli society is sick — and it is our duty to treat this disease . . . I’m not asking if they’ve forgotten how to be Jews, but if they’ve forgotten how to be decent human beings. Have they forgotten how to converse?”
Unfortunately Israel’s sickness is of the type that infects and affects the rest of humanity and like all plagues must be stopped before the consequence of its lethal epidemic potential reaches holocaust proportions. The most potent remedy for this sickness is the diaspora Jewish people themselves who must speak out unconditionally — irrespective of criticism and intimidation by Zionist pressure groups — against Israel’s illegal, unacceptable, and destructive behaviour. The historian and author of The Invention of the Jewish People, Shlomo Sand, whose past was Jewish, but who today sees Israel as one of the most racist societies in the western world, recently explained why he does not want to be Jewish anymore.
“ . . . I would like to apologise, if that would be of any significance, to the entire Palestinian people, throughout the generations. For 1948, for 1967 and for everything that happened in their wake. An apology for 1948 would not have made the state that was established less just – it would have become more just. For the mass expulsion and for preventing the return, for the ethnic cleansing in several districts and for several acts of slaughter, which may be part of every war – we can and should apologise . . . ”
Gideon Levy, Israeli journalist.
In the meantime while continuing to point fingers at the world for its indifference to anti-Semitism and the genocide of Jews, Zionist Apartheid Israel unashamedly exploits the Holocaust for political gains at the expense of the ethnically cleansed indigenous Palestinian people. Zionists have much to hide about their indifference, even collaboration, with the Nazis and the Fascists while their fellow Jews were being sent to concentration camps. There is no doubt that Zionist finger-pointing serves as a smoke screen to hide Zionism’s dark past of allowing other Jews to die, while the Zionists themselves were lobbying to rob the Palestinian people of their country.
“Every native population in the world resists colonists as long as it has the slightest hope of being able to rid itself of the danger of being colonised. That is what the Arabs in Palestine are doing, and what they will persist in doing as long as there remains a solitary spark of hope that they will be able to prevent the transformation of ‘Palestine’ into the ‘Land of Israel.’ . . . Zionist colonisation must either stop, or else proceed regardless of the native population. This means that it can proceed and develop only under the protection of a power that is independent of the native population –- behind an iron wall, which the native population cannot breach.”
Lenni Brenner (a Jew), in the Zionism in the Age of the Dictators
“The saving of the Jews in Europe did not figure at the head of the list of priorities of the ruling class. It was the foundation of the State which was primordial in their eyes.”
Tom Segev (a Jew), in The Seventh Million
William Hanna is a freelance writer with recently published books the Hiramic Brotherhood of the Third Temple and The Tragedy of Palestine and its Children. Purchase information, sample chapter, other articles, and contact details at:
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply